.jpg&w=244&h=193&zc=1 "Ranking the 2013 SEC RB Units")
2012 Pre-Season Preview: Arizona Wildcats
2011 Record: (4-8, 2-7 in Pac-12)
Head Coach: Rich Rodriguez (first year at Arizona, 120-84-2 All-Time)
Last Bowl Game: 2010 Alamo Bowl (lost to Oklahoma St 36-10)
Schedule Glimpse:
Big Name Out of Conference Opponent: 9/8 vs Oklahoma State
Must Win: 9/1 vs Toledo, 9/15 vs SC St
Swing Games: 9/29 vs Oregon State, 11/3 at UCLA, 11/10 vs Colorado, 11/17 at Utah, 11/23 vs Arizona St
Statistical Snapshot:
Stats to Cheer: 227 plays of 10 or more yards in 2011 (3rd in Pac-12, 15th in Nation)
Stat to Fear: had just 10 sacks in 2011 (last in Pac-12, 115th in Nation)
Personnel:
Phil Steele's Returning Starters: (Offense: 6; Defense: 6; Specialists: 1)
Key Defensive Returnees: S Marquis Flowers (68 tackles), CB Shaquille Richardson (47 tackles, 4 INTs)
Key Offensive Returnees: QB Matt Scott (776 yds passing, 4 TD, 2 INT in 2010), RB Ka'Deem Carey (425 yds rushing, 6 TD) WR Dan Buckner (42 rec), C Kyle Quinn
Top Recruits: OLB Dakota Conwell (Scout.com's #29 OLB), C Beau Boyster (#12 C), OG Zach Hemmila (#28 OG), MLB C.J. Dozier (#29 MLB)
Inside Scoop with Kyle Kensing of Saturday Blitz and Arizona Desert Swarm:
CFBZ: Which players on offense look like they are going to be a good fit for RichRod's scheme?
Kyle Kensing: First and foremost is Matt Scott. Scott's a fifth year senior who contributed significantly in 2010 while Nick Foles rehabbed from a knee injury. He played in a system similar to Rodriguez's while at California Southern Section power Corona Centennial and should acclimate well to the offense.
I also expect running back Ka'Deem Carey to break out as the feature back in Rodriguez's system. Carey came on strong in the latter half of last season, and will be used more frequently in the zone read. Greg Nwoko and Taimi Tutogi are solid power back options to support Carey, freshman J.T. Washington looked impressive in the little bit of high school footage I've seen, and could serve as a third down back. Daniel Jenkins was in competition for the feature role Carey is taking over, putting up his best numbers in November.
Overall, UA will have no trouble running the ball. And Scott's a proven passer, which will make for enough of a varied look to keep the offense rolling.
CFBZ: Jeff Casteel has taken over the defense. Do you think we will see improvement in year one or is this a turnaround that will take a bit longer on defense?
Kyle Kensing Year One of Casteel's defense will not be pretty. UA is paper thin at linebacker, especially with Brian Wagner quitting. The line is unproven. That's a tough combination. A possible benefit for Casteel, though, is if you have to rebuild a unit, might as well completely blow it up and start from scratch. Las Vegas doesn't build new casinos with elements from the old; the old are leveled to rubble. The Wildcat defense is in a similar situation.
CFBZ: What are the biggest reasons to be optimistic about Arizona football in 2012?
Kyle Kensing The offense has components to be explosive. The line has numerous combined starts, the running back corps is deep, and Scott is a natural for the new offense. UA also plays seven home games, including Oregon State and Colorado -- two games it probably had no business losing in 2011, but did. UA has also played Washington well in Tucson over the last few years, and the Huskies come to Arizona Stadium. Right there are three losses from a season ago that might change with a change of venue.
CFBZ: What is your gut feeling on the final record for 2012 and what makes the season successful in your eyes?
Kyle Kensing: A bowl bid would mark a wildly successful season. Last year, UA proved that expecting to go .500 or better by simply outscoring the opposition is no easy feat. One of the best offenses in program history was squandered, because it was constantly having to play catch up from the defense giving up big outputs. Look no further than the USC game, when Foles went off and UA managed 41 points yet still lost.
UA should put up points again this season, but the question is if its defense will see offenses anemic enough to give the offense a chance to win. 6-6 would be the brass ring: Toledo, South Carolina State, Oregon State, Colorado, Arizona State and UCLA are the most winnable games. 7-5 (add Washington and maybe, maybe Oklahoma State though that's a stretch, to the other six as possible Ws) would be astounding. USC and Oregon are complete forgot-about-its. Stanford is undergoing some change and may not be the juggernaut of the last two years, but UA has never played well there. That's an easy one to pencil in for an L.
Verdict:
Mike Stoops got Arizona to the level right above mediocrity for three seasons before the bottom dropped out last year and he was fired after winning just one of his first five. The Wildcats have turned to the somewhat controversial Rich Rodriguez to get their program headed in the right direction. RichRod was very successful at West Virginia but ultimately left them to go to Michigan. At Michigan he was just a bad fit and never really focused on defensive side of the football. At Arizona, RichRod has already taken more of interest in defensive simply by hiring Jeff Casteel from West Virginia.
RichRod inherits red-shirt senior QB Matt Scott and that should help Arizona have a good year offensively. Arizona has some weapons offensively and I would look for the Wildcats to be able to hand with some teams on their schedule because of their ability to score points. On defense it's going to be a work in progress. Not only will the Wildcats be switching to a new scheme but they will be doing so while playing a lot of underclassmen.
From a schedule standpoint, Arizona drew the short straw as they must face the top two teams from the Pac-12 North on the road (Oregon and Stanford). They also have two tough out of conference match-ups as they start off with Toledo and Oklahoma State. Toledo will score some points and they will be a tough first game for RichRod and Arizona. Overall, this is a re-building year for Arizona but I would look for some improvement over last year depending on how quickly RichRod and Matt Scott can get the offense going.
2012 Prediction: 5-7
Previous 2012 Previews:
ACC: Boston College, Duke, Georgia Tech, UNC, Virginia
Big 12: Kansas
Big Ten: Minnesota, Northwestern
C-USA: East Carolina, Houston, Memphis, Rice, SMU, Southern Miss, Tulane, Tulsa, UTEP
MAC: Akron, Ball State, Bowling Green, Buffalo, CMU, EMU, Kent St, Miami (OH), NIU, Ohio, Toledo, UMass, WMU
MWC: Air Force, Colorado St, Fresno St, Hawaii, Nevada, New Mexico, San Diego St, Wyoming
Sun Belt: Arkansas St, FAU, FIU, Louisiana, MTSU, North Texas, South Alabama, Troy, ULM, WKU
WAC: Idaho, Louisiana Tech, New Mexico St, San Jose St, Texas State, Utah State, UTSA
[follow]
1 Like
The Cats were arguably the worst defensive team in the PAC 12 last year and you don't get better at QB by losing Foles. Scott may be a solid and experienced replacement, but I don't think his supporting cast is as good as last years team, at least not at the skill positions.
RichRod is lucky he is getting 8 home games this year because I don't think he wins any of those 4 away games.
1 Like
@SaturdayEdge says the Arizona State guy....So are you looking at four or five wins? The difference between Foles and Scott could also be the guy calling the plays, not necessarily the individual talent of the two.
1 Like
@CFBZ They'll beat Toledo, SC St and Colorado. I don't see them beating any of those 4 road teams, including an improved UCLA in the Rose Bowl. I also don't see them beating USC even in Tucson.
That leaves "toss up" games, all in Tucson, against an Oklahoma State team with a true freshman QB making his first road start ever. an improved Oregon State, UW and ASU.
If they can split those 4 games they get to 5 wins.
@SaturdayEdge Good points, I think it might be more of the system they've been running lately. The Pac-12 is known for throwing the ball around (or unique attacks like Oregon) but I guess they do fit the Stanford and Utah molds (although a lot less successful recently).
1 Like
@CFBZ They have a large California presence (huge alumni # from CA). Back in their (McCartney) heydey, they used to recruit California hard.
Academically they have a lot more in common with the PAC 12 schools (especially Bezerkley) than they ever did with the less academically challenged Big 12 schools (not including Texas).
@SaturdayEdge Maybe it's just me but I've always thought Colorado was a weird fit for the Pac-12.
1 Like
@CFBZ Very true, and from a talent perspective, there is very little (if any) difference between Utah, ASU, AZ & UCLA. It's just a matter of venues and who is hot (more motivated and better prepared) that particular day.
USC and CU seem to be on the opposite ends of the talent spectrum.
@SaturdayEdge The good news for these teams in the Pac-12 South is that outside of USC and possibly Utah, all of them are on a pretty equal level. I just have to see it out of UCLA before I buy it.
1 Like
@CFBZ Agreed. Plus they may have a redshirt frosh at QB (Hundley). I was watching an interview of OC Mazzone (ASU's OC last year) and he said the offense was scratching and clawing for yards in spring.
That seemed to be an endorsement that the Bruin D is looking good. But he also seemed to be insinuating that the offense was struggling too.
1 Like
@SaturdayEdge Their (UCLA) offense scares me a little bit. They are moving from a pistol that they never really learned how to run to an offense that will require extreme precision and will likely be feast or famine.
1 Like
@CFBZ Definitely not impossible, but your scenario still has them winning one of those away games and I am skeptical about that.
I think they stand a better chance of beating UW and ASU in Tucson than they do beating UCLA in Pasadena.
I;m hearing/reading a lot of positives coming out of Westwood. Bruins 7-5 this year?
1 Like
@SaturdayEdge Mora has a chance to be a decent college coach for a few years because he's a complete windbag who's going to get these kids to buy into what he says until they figure out in four years that he's completely full of shit and a total douche.
The reason I like Toledo to be close is it's Arizona's first game and they will still be working out kinks and Toledo can flat out score. Toledo returns both of their QBs and they are both really good for a mid-major team. They did lose a lot of production but they have some players that will step in and be good at the skill positions. With as bad as the Arizona defense might be, this is a tough game to play right out of the gate.
It would have to be perfect but they could beat Toledo, SC St, Oregon St, UCLA, Colorado and Arizona State to get six wins. It's not like that's an impossible task. It's not probable, but far from impossible.
1 Like
@CFBZ I think they have a slim chance in hell of beating the Pokes. Freshman QB, no more stud WR and a mediocre defense. It could happen, doubtful, but possible.
Mora may be a joke, but that is a step up from the nightmare that was Rick Neuweasal. How that guy ever got the opportunity to coach at UCLA after running two programs into the ground, I'll never know.
Toledo lost a ton on both sides of the ball. Last time these two played it was a complete blowout. Toledo didn't have the athletes to keep up.
If the U of A is winning 6 games this year, they are upsetting someone at home (OSU or USC) and/or winning 1 of those road games where I project they will be at least a TD dog in every one (DD dogs in Eugene and Palo Alto).
@SaturdayEdge No way in hell they beat Okie State and they might lose to Toledo since it's their opener. I'm not sold on UCLA. I mean Jim Mora Jr is their coach and he's a joke. I see that game as a toss up. I think 4 to 6 is probably what we are looking at here but stranger things have happened.
